Editorial Standards and Source Methodology

SWATVA publishes practical supplement education for readers in India. Our job is to make labels, ingredient forms, evidence and limitations easier to inspect—not to turn preliminary research into promises.

How an article is made

1. Search intent: we define the reader’s actual question before drafting.
2. Source hierarchy: we prefer primary human research, official regulator material and recognised standards. Reviews help us find studies but do not replace the cited paper when a primary source is available.
3. Claim matching: we record the population, dose, duration, comparator and outcome. We do not assume that an ingredient result proves the same result for a finished product.
4. Commercial review: product mentions must explain fit and limitations. Payment or purchase is not required to read the evidence.
5. Update check: material edits change the article’s updated date. Corrections are made in the live copy.

Medical review

Medical review is shown only when a named, suitably qualified reviewer has approved the article. Until that happens, health and ingredient articles are marked “medical review not yet completed.” We will not invent a reviewer, qualification or review date.

Conflicts and limitations

SWATVA sells Daily Greens and Signal, so our articles can have a commercial interest. Product links are labelled and ingredient-study findings are not presented as clinical proof of a SWATVA formula. General content is not diagnosis or personal medical advice.

Corrections

Send a source, factual correction or disclosed conflict to hello@houseofswatva.com. Include the article URL and the exact sentence in question.

Meet the SWATVA authors or inspect the research approach.